Sunday, December 31, 2006

Happy New Year, ya Sexaholics!!

Damn!!

2007 is here already?!

B4 I get 2 fucked-up 2nite, I wanted 2 wish everybody in perv-land a Happy & Horny New Year!!


What a Lovely Sight 4 The New Year!!


Don't get 2 fucked-up, ;) !




Here, have some bubbly!



Have a nice & safe 1, ya pervs!!

Monday, December 25, 2006

Merry Christmas, Pervs!


Merry Christmas, ya pervs!!!



3 Beautiful Christmas Asses!



Santa is gettin' his "groove on!"



Cowgirl 4 Santa! Ride it, baby!



I want "Doggy" 4 Christmas, Santa!



She was "bad" & got Anal from Santa!

She liked it, though...

Seriously though, I hope eveyone has a happy, healthy, & wealthy Christmas!

Keep in mind that Christmas is about PEACE & not WAR.

As the ol' sayin' goes, "Make LOVE, not WAR!"

Sorry if I sound like a damn hippie...

Saturday, December 23, 2006

Strip clubs begin to see other benefits of women...

Here's some info on a trend that's been happening lately.

Women in strip clubs as patrons.

I got this tidbit from The Las Vegas Sun that was originally posted in 7/06.

*************


Strip clubs begin to see other benefits of women

By Abigail Goldman <abigail.goldman@lasvegassun.com>
Las Vegas Sun, July 03, 2006


Of their 3 a.m. strip-club sojourn, the sanguine tourists would later explain, the lap dances were not for the grind, but for the conversation and company. The visitors - two women from California - each picked a private dancer from the lingerie armada at Seamless Gentlemen's Club and, well, chatted with entertainers at the going rate: $20 a dance, tip not included.

"It's sort of a bonding thing," said Ana Monje, 28, of her Saturday morning lap dance with Raven, a black-maned Seamless stripper in a white bustier. "It was kind of like a break from the guys. We talked about moisturizer." Women, once only welcome through a stage door in heels, are being embraced as customers by a growing group of strip club owners who see in the softer sex big potential for hard cash. By recasting the strip club as an equal opportunity adult destination, some club executives say they have created a new level of legitimacy and reached a fresh crowd: wives and girlfriends, women everywhere, eager to size up the champagne room.

Not all local strip club owners think it is such a good idea.

In August, however, club owners from across the country will meet in Las Vegas to discuss the very subject at the 14th Annual Gentlemen's Club Owners Expo. Industry executives will hear a two-hour panel address, in part, the different "ways to attract and sustain female clientele."
For many clubs, the first step will require breaking an unwritten industry rule: no unescorted women allowed. "There used to be a sense of proprietorship - the idea that this is a man's world once you come through those doors," says Stephen McWilliams, director of operations for The Men's Club, a Texas-based topless-club chain, and an August panelist. "There were hundreds of stories about women causing problems." In the strip club mythos, only two types of women come in alone: irate wives hoping to snare their husbands, and prostitutes looking for johns. To avoid both, club owners have historically buttressed their businesses with velvet ropes and bouncers.

Banning such problematical women, however, also succeeded in scaring away those who might come with a man, or for their own legitimate reasons, says Angelina Spencer, executive director of the Association of Club Executives, a national trade association for adult nightclubs. As a result, club owners have been slow to discover what potential profits lurk in women's wallets. "There is a difference between ignorance and stupidity, and I think a lot of this just rests on ignorance," says Spencer. "They simply haven't thought of women as an added revenue stream." The fact remains that even where allowed, unescorted women do not really show up at strip clubs in any meaningful numbers. But the mere act of inviting them inside, she says, appeals to the real new cash cow: couples.

"Men and women are all going together, and they are seeing it as just another bar, rather than a gentleman's club," says Spencer, who opened the doors of her Cleveland strip club to unescorted women 10 years ago. "The thing I always hear from women? This isn't as bad as I thought." The recent evolution of gentlemen's clubs, from roadside skin shops to rococo megaplexes such as Sapphire, the 70,000-square-foot Vegas club that sold for $80 million in January, attracted a new breed of female clients willing to humor a strip club that does not seem seedy. At the August Expo, McWilliams will advise his colleagues to capitalize on the trend - if you build a lavish club, women will come. And if you market your lavish club, women will come back.

"You are removing the stigma of what's behind those doors," McWilliams says. "You remove the barrier, you encourage women to come in; you encourage the overall experience." Spencer lured women into her Ohio club with an ad campaign that promised "unescorted women and couples welcome" and a series of special events - "fantasy nights" where housewives could fulfill their striptease desires for an audience of significant others. By the time Spencer sold the club, about two years ago, half the Saturday night scene was women. "We tout it as one of the ways to spice up a date night," Spencer says. "Unconventional? Definitely. Fun? Hell yes."

Some Las Vegas club owners aren't so sure.

Treasures Gentlemen's Club, which calls itself the world's most luxurious, serves 28-ounce porterhouses at its steakhouse and $30 cigars to any clients so inclined. Couples are welcome - on a slow Thursday, manager Nick Foskaris reported at least four - but unescorted women are strictly prohibited. One concern is that groups of women might bother the strippers, Foskaris says. Unescorted women are not allowed at Cheetahs, Crazy Horse Too, The Library or the Spearmint Rhino, either, among others. At Sheri's Cabaret, it's by the manager's permission only. Alan Lichtenstein, attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union, thinks anyone interested in challenging such rules would have a "pretty good case."

So far, no one has taken up the cause.

Women can walk in the front door at Olympic Garden, says club manager Delores Eliades, whose father, Pete Eliades, also allowed women into Sapphire before selling the club this year.
Still, they are secondarily important, Delores Eliades says because men tend to spend more money in the company of near-naked women: "Women will partake in the gentlemen's club - I think there's a natural inquisitiveness - but it's in bits and pieces. For some women, it's an experience, or they come because it's a special event. Some women are just pacifying whoever they're with." At Seamless, where parking is valet only and guests are greeted at the door by a bikinied woman writhing in a 10-foot martini glass, Monje and friend Ava Otway, a 28-year-old Los Angeles mom, had lured their male friends into the club.

"It was our idea to come here," Otway says. "I'm mainly an observer. I'm straight, but I think women are beautiful. I think most women would like to look at other women." Unescorted women are allowed into Seamless after midnight. Four hours later, at 4 a.m., the bar stools are carried out, the topless dancers' catwalk is folded into the ceiling and the strippers start putting their shirts back on. To attract a wider audience, the gentleman's club transforms itself into a dance club every night, seamlessly. On a recent weekend morning, the paying customers doubled to about 200 people as the club converted. "You look at your sources of revenue, you try to figure out where the people are," says club manager Marty Helfand.

After 4, lap dances are offered only in private VIP rooms, away from the clubbing crowd.
"The entertainers are still there, they're allowed to walk the floor, but we have them change into less seductive outfits," Hefland says. "At a regular night club, you have to attract the women, and if the female guests are uncomfortable, the guys are not going to come back." Monje and Otway, who visited Seamless with a group of guys, certainly seemed comfortable. Before leaving the club, Monje stopped by the bar to tell Raven goodbye. They exchanged a two-cheek kiss - friendly and meaningless.

Gentlemen's club insiders can debate the issue, but Raven, a stripper for six years, is certain where the profits pencil out.

"Women tip better, they're spending their boyfriend's money," she says, fishing cash from her purse for a drink at the bar. "You ignore the man and approach the woman - as a couple, she holds the power."

Abigail Goldman can be reached at 259-8806 or at goldman@lasvegassun.com.


*********

Wow...

U want my opinion on this subject?

Read #5 that's on this prior post.

Friday, December 22, 2006

What I don't like 2 c in a strip club...

Hey, pervs.

These r just a few things I DON'T like 2 c when I go 2 a strip club, whether I'm workin' there or just visiting 1.


**********

1) A beautiful stripper that smells.

There's nothing worse than a fine-lookin' lady that stinks, especially if it's between her legs or behind her like she didn't wipe her ass when she's in your face. Or giving u a lap dance & she stinks. I don't wanna stink! Don't rub that shit on me! I know that strippin' is hard work & u r gonna work up a sweat under those hot lights, but get a towel & dry off abit b4 u interact w/ the customers. Two words, ladies: Body spray.

2) A stripper w/ sexy legs, but didn't shave them.

Ladies, please shave those sexy legs of yours! I know it's a chore, but silky smooth legs translates in2 more $$$.

3) Pubes

I HATE seeing pubes right in front of my face while u r onstage. PLEASE SHAVE!
'Nuff said!

4) A drunk stripper

If u can't handle your liquor, then DON'T DRINK! If u can't handle your job as a stripper, then DON'T STRIP! Nothing's more disgusting than lookin' @ a drunk stripper (or a drunk ANYONE, 4 that matter) in high heels as she stumbles along in the club. Most clubs have a "no-drink" policy 4 the girls, but this doesn't stop a customer from buying them 1.

5) A stripper's boyfriend or girlfriend in the club

Leave your boyfriend/girlfriend/lover/chum/friend with benefits/entourage AT HOME! Believe it or not, strippin' is A BUSINESS & should b treated like 1. No 1 is goin' 2 tip u w/ your "hanger-on" following u around the club. Trust me.

6) Arrogant/Stuck-up Strippers

Ladies, I know u deal w/ jerks/assholes/idiots all night, but please don't b 1 yourself. There's nothing uglier than a stripper w/ a fucked-up attitude. I've actually seen strippers that r only average-looking make more $$$ than the "bombshells" because they were friendlier & conversated w/ the customer, while the pretty 1's thought their shit didn't stink (it does) & couldn't b bothered.

7) A talkative DJ

2 the DJs: STOP TALKING SO DAMN MUCH! I personally keep the chatter on the mic 2 a minumum because I want 2 c the ladies "shake their thang" w/o alot of gab from the DJ. I know it's your job, but please keep the talk 2 a minumum.

8) A stripper w/ a dirty/unclean costume

Changing 1's costume ever set is very important. Nobody wants 2 tip a dancer w/ a unclean costume on. It looks ghetto (Sorry 4 the expression).

9) A group of strippers by themselves

If there r customers in the club, the dancers SHOULD NOT b huddled among themselves gossiping about other girls or some of the customers. U have 2 b out there among "the people" in order 2 make any $$$. Mingle, ladies, MINGLE!

10) Loud Strippers

Nothing's more embarassing than a stripper that is really loud in a strip club. It's not necessary & it really puts off the customers, especially if it's a slow night & u r complaining that u r not making any $$$. & another thing: DON'T CUSS OUT A CUSTOMER IF HE DIDN'T DO ANYTHING 2 U. It's really low-class if a stripper calls out a customer/customers merely because he's not spending his entire paycheck in the club.


*********

I'm sure I can think of some more shit (& I will later), but I'm tired (took the night off 2 do some X-Mas shopping) & I need 2 get up early tomorrow (or 2day, depending on how u look @ it) 2 take care of some bills.

Later...

Poorest of suburbs welcomes "palace" 4 exotic dancers...

This is nice.

FINALLY some1 WELCOLMING a strip club in their community.

That's why I just had 2 post this story, courtesy of The Daily Southtown, a newspaper near Chi-Town (that's Chicago, Illinois 4 the ignorant).





********


Poorest of suburbs welcomes 'palace' for exotic dancers
December 18, 2006
By Guy Tridgell Staff writer

The marble bricks were the first indication the new business in Ford Heights was going to be different. The sleek, tan-and-white blocks, stacked across two stories, form a Roman-style edifice featuring muted columns along the sides. An expansive copper dome crowns the entrance. Punctuating the building at Illinois 394 and U.S. 30 are four smaller cupolas on each corner. The glitzy development, unlike anything for miles around, will open next month as a strip club. Not just any old strip club, but the finest gentlemen's establishment in the Chicago area, village officials said. "It is a palace," Ford Heights Mayor Saul Beck said. "This is the way it is supposed to be. It won't be a truckers' paradise. It is going to be a clean operation." The investors, Beck said, are sinking more than $1 million into a building the size of a warehouse.

The business will bring valuable property taxes to a village with struggling schools, the mayor said. An admission tax will help Ford Heights pay for its municipal services, which are on the cusp of being cut. But its neighbors are curious about who is behind the operation. Beck said he could not recall the name of the developers who won the village's permission to build. "You never know who owns anything anymore," he said. Because of the building's location next to an air traffic transmitter, approval was needed from the Federal Aviation Administration. The attorney who handled the FAA application could not be reached for comment.

Lynwood Police Chief David Palmer, worried his officers might be called to the strip club in an emergency, said he had no luck getting any information. "We really can't find out too much about it," Palmer said. "There is a lot of money being poured into that place. I want to see who we are dealing with." Lawyers for Orland Park businessman John Einoder, who runs the Lincoln Ltd. landfill next to the construction site, insisted their client has nothing to do with the building. Dan Mahan, owner of the Asian Automotive garage next door, said the structure draws attention. "It is going to be beautiful. They have been working on the outside of it forever," Mahan said. "A lot of people keep asking me what is going to be the name." With nearly half its population unemployed, Ford Heights is known as one of the country's poorest communities.

The village was awarded $6.4 million in federal grants five years ago to tap into Lake Michigan water to spur economic development. The mayor said he has no qualms putting down the welcome mat for what he called the country's No. 1 industry. "We have got no jobs," Beck said. "We have got no industry giving out any jobs." He said the strip club will be no different than anything in Las Vegas. Beck added that most people who attend strip clubs are OK with the businesses -- as long as they are not in their town.

"A lot of people say they don't go to casinos," the mayor said. "You see ministers coming out of casinos saying, 'I'm just checking on my members.' "

Guy Tridgell may be reached at gtridgell@dailysouthtown.comor (708) 633-5970.

**********



Hell yeah!!


It's about fuckin' time we get some good press...

Monday, December 11, 2006

Nun Intercoursing Boys...

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Rumor has it...

... that a stripper in a Greensboro, NC strip club was slammed on the floor by a patron because he fell in luv w/ her & she wouldn't have sex w/ him.

The cops & paramedics came & everything, the way I heard it.

This is 2nd-hand info, so don't quote me.

If this really did happen (& my sources say it did), then I have one question:


Where was the fuckin' security???

Cops Raid two Memphis Strip Clubs...

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Patron Shoots Stripper...

This shit is crazy!!


Here's more info on the strip club front. Ladies you gotta b careful out there.


A couple of questions, though:

1) Where was the fuckin' security @?

2) How did this ass get a gun in2 the club in the 1st place?


The link where I found this story is here.



++++++++


Patron Shoots Stripper
then kills himself at Cheerleaders Gentlemen's Club in south Philly

--Associated Press

PHILADELPHIA - A strip-club regular paid to meet with a favorite dancer and then shot her and himself in a semi-private room, authorities said. Lawrence McGuigan, 49, of Philadelphia, died at a hospital Friday following the shooting at the Cheerleaders Gentlemen's Club. Dancer Harmony Adams, 31, of Croydon, was shot in the back of the neck but is expected to survive, police said.

"He specifically wanted to be at this place with her," said police Capt. Benjamin Naish. "He had paid money to spend time with her." The shooting occurred at about 9 p.m. Thursday, in the club's Champagne Room. Adams remained in intensive care on Saturday, a spokeswoman at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital said. Police believe the shootings were intentional. McGuigan had been despondent and threatened suicide recently, authorities said.

Marc S. Raspanti, a lawyer for the South Philadelphia club, called the shooting "an unfortunate event caused by an obviously despondent person." The club is cooperating with police, he said. McGuigan had been arrested twice on drunken driving charges in 2006, and was due in court Friday on the second case. He was convicted of the first offense and was scheduled to serve a three-day jail term in January.

He had been convicted in August of driving with a blood-alcohol level that was three times the legal limit. The sentence included a one-year license suspension, a $1,000 fine and parole.



++++++++++



Why do people get crazy during the fuckin' holidays???

Sunday, December 10, 2006

Lollipops Strip Club manager arrested...

Yeah, yeah, yeah, I know: "It's been awhile."

I gotta shop 4 Christmas, don't I?

Here's some info from the strip club world around the country, courtesy of The Orlando Sentinel & Adultfyi.com.


The original link is here.



++++++++++++


Lollipops Strip Club manager arrested
At issue is $8,500 in allegedly illegal campaign contributions

--Orlando Sentinel

Daytona- A Daytona Beach strip-club manager was arrested Wednesday on a felony warrant alleging he funneled $8,500 in illegal campaign contributions to two City Commission candidates last year.

A former political consultant who also serves as the second-in-command at the Seminole County Clerk of the Court's Office is accused of acting as a middleman for the transactions but has not been arrested. Sean L. Bishop, the 39-year-old manager of Lollipops Gentlemen's Club, surrendered at the Volusia County Branch Jail for the two election-law violations. The violations date back to an undercover operation 14 months ago in which former candidate Paul Zimmerman and City Commissioner Shiela McKay wore hidden microphones while discussing the contributions, according to court records. Bishop was released on $7,500 bond. "This is definitely a case in which I'm positive that Mr. Bishop had no involvement," said Brett Hartley, Bishop's attorney.

Bob Lewis, deputy court clerk in Seminole, was the person who met with the candidates, according to an investigative report from the Florida Department of Law Enforcement.
Lewis is a former political consultant who has been active in Seminole County Republican politics for years, running countywide and city races. He denied any wrongdoing. "I have never had any meeting or conversation or contact with Sean Bishop," he said. He said he met with the candidates to offer his services as a political consultant, which they refused.
FDLE spokeswoman Susie Murphy said she couldn't discuss whether other arrests or charges would be forthcoming.

"This is still an active investigation," she said Wednesday. Zimmerman, who lost his bid for the Zone 2 seat, was pleased the investigation yielded an arrest. "I had lost faith and was very frustrated with the investigation," he said. McKay, who won re-election in 2005, was relieved the investigation confirmed her suspicions about the contributions. "I knew there was illegality going on there," she said. "I helped because I just wanted people in this city to see what is going on."

According to the FDLE report, Bishop is accused of being the source behind $8,500 in contributions to Zimmerman and McKay. Investigators said other people wrote the checks and were reimbursed by Bishop. Lewis met with both candidates, while another person delivered the checks during separate meetings, according to the report. The person who delivered the checks has not been arrested.

Florida law limits personal contributions to no more than $500 to a candidate for each election.
Zimmerman said he was suspicious about the offer of financial help and contacted the State Attorney's Office, where the investigators asked if he would help their investigation.
"I met with Lewis, and I wore a wire," Zimmerman said. Bishop's strip club is one of many that have been battling Daytona Beach in court over the city's nudity ordinance, which a federal judge struck down last year. The case is still on appeal before the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta.

During meetings in September 2005, Zimmerman said, the source of the campaign money was vague, and there were no specific requests of him. "There was no quid pro quo, but it's an implication," he said. "They say, 'We'll fund your campaign, and you'll remember who we are.' That's how it works." Zimmerman said he thinks such arrangements are common. "It's my belief that this was typical of the way politics is run in Daytona Beach," he said. McKay also remembered being told that no strings were attached to the contributions. "They never did ask for favors or specific votes," she said.

Lewis acknowledged meeting with Zimmerman and McKay in 2005, but only to offer his services as a campaign consultant. The pair was among a half-dozen or so Daytona candidates Lewis said he contacted that year. Zimmerman and McKay turned down his offer, he said. "They had no interest in using my services," he said. Lewis said he offered to raise -- not provide -- campaign contributions for Zimmerman and McKay.

"It comes down to the difference between provide and raise," he said. "That's a pretty narrow distinction to determine whether you're a crook or not." Lewis acknowledged knowing -- and at times hiring -- the person accused of delivering the checks to do campaign work in Volusia County. But he denied that the person was working for him when the checks were provided to McKay and Zimmerman. Lewis' boss, Clerk of the Court Maryanne Morse, thinks Lewis is not involved.

"I just don't buy it," she said. "I haven't talked to him about it, but the idea he would be involved in it doesn't make sense. If they had any evidence, why isn't he being named as a co-conspirator?"

++++++++++++++++++


If this is true, then the guy is dumb 4 doin' it in such a fashion.

Ya ever heard of forming a PAC???

Wednesday, November 15, 2006

Big' Un's...

Damn Chelsea Charms...




Those r some BIG, FUCKIN' TITTIES!!


I wonder if they r real...

(Yes, I'm being a smartass! ;)

Adult Businesses vs. G'boro City Council: Round #2

Hear we fuckin' go again!!

Why can't these people GET A LIFE & LEAVE ADULT BUSINESSES ALONE?!

Here's the minutes 2 the actual meeting 2 go @ it again.
Look 4 the renewed fight on pgs. 44 - 48 of the minutes.


They'll lose just like they did last time!!!




Strippers United!!

Tuesday, November 14, 2006

Tuesday, November 07, 2006

Strippers United: WE WON, WE WON, WE WON!!!

I'll b damned...

It's not in The G'boro News and Record (It's actually old news. It's dated 9/15/06. How come NOONE reported on it??), but it's news 2 me...

WE WON!!


YAAAYY!!




Thanks 2 The House of Xanadu blog & The Troublemaker's blog 4 the info. I was looking all over 4 some news on this & couldn't find ANYTHING!


The newspapers didn't report it, News 2 and the other TV stations didn't say anything.

WHY???


Make that $$$, baby!




Strippers waiting anxiously 4 the ruling





Here's the whole thing:


++++++++++

This is the html version of the file

http://www.ncmd.uscourts.gov/Opinions/Sep06/05cv1166moo.pdf.

G o o g l e automatically generates html versions of documents as we crawl the web.To link to or bookmark this page, use the following url: http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:a-FqlnbgC2wJ:www.ncmd.uscourts.gov/Opinions/Sep06/05cv1166moo.pdf+greensboro+sexually+oriented+business&hl=en&gl=us&amp;ct=clnk&cd=1&ie=UTF-8

Google is neither affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its content.
These search terms have been highlighted:
greensboro sexually oriented business

Page 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
GIOVANNI CARANDOLA, LTD., a

North Carolina Corporation d/b/a Christie’s Cabaret, Y.K. ENTERPRISES, INC., a North Carolina corporation d/b/a Southside Johnnie’s, REESAW, INC., a North Carolina ) Corporation d/b/a Chester’s Premier Gentlemen’s Club, E.K.’S II, INC., a North Carolina Corporation d/b/a
Harper’s II, CARL EDWARD COLLINS, d/b/a Harper’s Exotic Car Wash, SIMPLY EXPLICIT, L.L.C., a North Carolina Corporation, TREASURE BOX, Inc., a North Carolina Corporation, d/b/a Xanadu Video and Boutique,

Plaintiffs, v. 1:05CV1166
THE CITY OF GREENSBORO, a North Carolina Municipal Corporation,

Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER
Plaintiffs, operators of adult-oriented businesses around Greensboro, North Carolina, filed this action seeking relief from ordinances that Defendant City of Greensboro (“Defendant”)
promulgated and enforced. Pending before this court is a motion for summary judgment from Plaintiffs Giovanni Carandola, Ltd., Y.K. Enterprises, Inc., Reesaw, Inc., E.K.’s II, Carl Edward
Collins, and Treasure Box, Inc. (“Plaintiffs”) on the amended Case 1:05-cv-01166-WLO-PTS Document 27 Filed 09/15/2006 Page 1 of 8

Page 2
2
complaint’s third count. For the reasons stated below, the court
will grant Plaintiffs’ motion.
I.
FACTS
Plaintiffs’ adult-oriented businesses market erotic-dance
presentations and sexually explicit publications. When these
businesses commenced operations, they were in compliance with
Defendant’s then-existing ordinances. Defendant contends that
Plaintiffs’ businesses, however, violate a recently adopted
ordinance.
Defendant first regulated adult-oriented businesses in 1995.
During October 2001, Defendant passed an amending ordinance that
expanded the distance adult-oriented establishments must be from
certain properties. See City of Greensboro, N.C., Dev. Ordinance
§ 30-5-2.73.5 (as amended Oct. 16, 2001). That section bans,
through various ways, adult-oriented businesses from locating in
certain places. Section 30-5-2.73.5(B), as currently in effect
under the 2001 amendment, requires the following:
(1) No sexually oriented business shall locate within
one thousand two hundred (1,200) feet of any other
sexually oriented business.
(2) No sexually oriented business shall locate within
one thousand (1,000) feet of a church, public or
private elementary or secondary school, child day
care center or nursery school, public park, or
residentially zoned property.
Section 30-5-2.73.5(G) gives businesses a time limit in which to
discontinue nonconforming uses.
Defendant interprets section 30-5-2.73.5(B) to apply to
existing businesses, not just newly created businesses. Thus,
Case 1:05-cv-01166-WLO-PTS Document 27 Filed 09/15/2006 Page 2 of 8

Page 3
3
Defendant’s interpretation requires all adult-oriented
businesses, though not violating any ordinance prior to the 2001
amendments, to comply with subsection (B) after its enactment.
Plaintiffs, whose businesses do not conform to Defendant’s
interpretation of subsection (B), seek a declaration that this
interpretation is incorrect as a matter of law.

II. ANALYSIS
Summary judgment is appropriate where an examination of the
pleadings, affidavits, and other proper discovery materials
before the court demonstrates that no genuine issues of material
facts exist, thus entitling the moving party to judgment as a
matter of law. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c); Celotex Corp. v. Catrett,
477 U.S. 317, 322–23, 106 S. Ct. 2548, 2552 (1986). The parties
do not dispute any facts. The issue is purely one of statutory
interpretation. When a “dispute ultimately turns entirely on a
question of statutory interpretation, the district court [can]
properly proceed[] to resolve the case on summary judgment.”
United States v. West Virginia, 339 F.3d 212, 214 (4th Cir.
2003).

The court first examines the ordinance’s plain language.
“When construing a statute so explicit in scope, a court must act
within certain well-defined constraints. If a legislative
purpose is explained in ‘plain and unambiguous language, . . .
the . . . duty of the courts is to give it effect according to
its terms.’” Ruhe v. Bergland, 683 F.2d 102, 104 (4th Cir. 1982)
(alterations in original) (quoting United States v. Rutherford,
Case 1:05-cv-01166-WLO-PTS Document 27 Filed 09/15/2006 Page 3 of 8

Page 4
44
442 U.S. 544, 551, 99 S. Ct. 2470, 2475 (1979)); accord, e.g.,
South Carolina Dep’t of Health & Envtl. Control v. Commerce &
Indus. Ins. Co., 372 F.3d 245, 255 (4th Cir. 2004) (“In resolving
issues of statutory construction, we are obliged to begin with
the language of a statute. If the statute is clear, ‘judicial
inquiry into the statute’s meaning, in all but the most
extraordinary circumstances, is finished.’” (quoting Estate of
Cowart v. Nicklos Drilling Co., 505 U.S. 469, 475, 112 S. Ct.
2589, 2594 (1992)). “The plainness or ambiguity of statutory
language is determined by reference to the language itself, the
specific context in which that language is used, and the broader
context of the statute as a whole.” Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.,
519 U.S. 337, 341, 117 S. Ct. 843, 846 (1997).

Section 30-5-2.73.5(B) requires that “[n]o sexually oriented
business shall locate within” a certain distance of other
properties. City of Greensboro, N.C., Dev. Ordinance § 30-5-
2.73.5(B) (emphasis added.) On its face, the ordinance
unambiguously makes the act of locating within a certain place
unlawful. Contrary to Defendant’s arguments, the ordinance bans
only the active, future establishment of prohibited businesses.
A business established before the amendment cannot “locate”
within a certain area because such businesses have already
located in the area. To thereafter “locate” in this ordinance’s
meaning, further action such as relocation is required. “Shall
locate,” thus, does not mean “shall have located prior to this
amendment” because such a meaning is illogical.
Case 1:05-cv-01166-WLO-PTS Document 27 Filed 09/15/2006 Page 4 of 8

Page 5
1
The court notes that section 30-5-2.73.5(B)(2) bars one
“sexually oriented business” from locating too closely to “a
church, public or private elementary or secondary school, child
day care center or nursery school, public park, or residentially
zoned property.” In this case, the problematic application does
not exist. However, this does not concern the court because no
party argues that (1) and (2) of section 30-5-2.73.5(B) have
different meanings of “shall locate.” Thus, implicit in this
entire opinion is that “shall locate” has a consistent meaning
within, at least, section 30-5-2.73.5(B).
5

Moreover, applying part of the ordinance dictates that
“locate” must apply only to adult-oriented businesses that locate
or establish after the amendment’s enactment. The ordinance, in
part (1), bans one adult-oriented business from locating too
closely to another adult-oriented business; for example, one
business is first rightfully present, and then another, newly
located business is too close. If two businesses are too close
to each other prior to the amendment, the law would not define
which of the two was nonconforming. Both cannot be nonconforming
because the law forbids one business from being too closely
placed to another rightfully present business. Since the law,
under Defendant’s interpretation, would bar this conduct without
resolving which one is nonconforming, Defendant’s interpretation
is untenable.
1

The ordinance’s plain language bars locating an
adult-oriented business within the specified distances after the
ordinance’s enactment.


This reading is reasonable in light of the section’s other
uses of “locate.” Subsection (C) of that same section states
that “[n]o sexually oriented business shall be permitted to be
located in the Old Greensborough National Register Historic
Case 1:05-cv-01166-WLO-PTS Document 27 Filed 09/15/2006 Page 5 of 8

Page 6
6
District.” City of Greensboro, N.C., Dev. Ordinance § 30-5-
2.73.5(C) (emphasis added). “Locate” is used in a different form
and context in this subsection; instead of merely stating no
business “shall locate” in the historic district, it states that
no business “shall be permitted to be located.” “Shall be
permitted to be located” means that a business cannot exist in
the historic district at all. “Located” in this sentence is the
act of merely being or existing within the specific area,
whenever the being or existing commenced. Under Defendant’s
proffered interpretation, “shall be permitted to be located” and
“shall locate” would have the exact same meaning because both
forms would cover the act of merely existing in a certain area.
Defendant’s reading is contrary to explicit statutory language
and the relevant contexts that create two different meanings—one
for “shall locate” and one for “shall be located.”

This reading does not, as Defendant vigorously argues,
render subsection (G) meaningless. Subsection (G) gives
businesses a time period in which to correct a nonconforming use
that predates the amendment. A business would need a time period
only if the ordinance rendered preexisting conditions
nonconforming, which is how Defendant interprets subsection (B).
Defendant’s argument cannot prevail. Subsection (G) applies to
the entire text of section 30-5-2.73.5, which bans a variety of
conditions. As discussed above, some parts of section 30-5-
Case 1:05-cv-01166-WLO-PTS Document 27 Filed 09/15/2006 Page 6 of 8

Page 7
2
The court uses “do appear to ban” only because the precise
meaning of this section is not dispositive to this case except to
the extent its meaning aids in construction of subsection (B).
The court uses this language to affirm that it is not construing
this provision as a matter of law.
7
2.73.5 do appear to ban preexisting conditions.

2
See, e.g., City
of Greensboro, N.C., Dev. Ordinance § 30-5-2.73.5(C). Moreover,
nothing in subsection (G) requires it to apply in full effect to
all other parts of section 30-5-2.73.5. Thus, the court’s
interpretation does not render subsection (G) meaningless because
it applies to other, relevant parts of section 30-5-2.73.5.
In applying the ordinance, Defendant contends that
Plaintiffs violated it by having been too closely located to
certain properties prior to the enactment of the ordinance.
Defendant admits that Plaintiffs have not established a business
in the area after the ordinance’s enactment. For the reasons
herein above set forth, the moving Defendant is entitled to
summary judgment on Count III of the amended complaint. The
court assumes Defendant will not try to enforce the ordinance
following entry of this order unless the order is reversed upon
an appeal.

III. CONCLUSION
For the reasons stated above,
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion of Certain Plaintiffs for
Summary Judgment [19], that is, Plaintiffs Giovanni Carandola,
Ltd., Y.K. Enterprises, Inc., Reesaw, Inc., E.K.’s II, Carl
Edward Collins, and Treasure Box, Inc., as to C
ount III of the
amended complaint, is GRANTED.
Case 1:05-cv-01166-WLO-PTS Document 27 Filed 09/15/2006 Page 7 of 8
Page 8
8
This the 15th day of September 2006.
_____________________________________
United States District Judge
Case 1:05-cv-01166-WLO-PTS Document 27 Filed 09/15/2006 Page 8 of 8


++++++++++


Common sense really can win the day!


Democray & Strippers:
There's Nothing More American!

Thursday, November 02, 2006

'Porn king' faces drugs, weapons charges...

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Penthouse Acquires Danni Ashe and Video Bliss...

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Strip Club Owner gets 16 Years...

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Teen rapes his own mother...

What the fuck is the world coming 2?

Believe it or not, this is a true story!

There is actual video of this trailer trash admitting 2 the crime just 2 get back @ his brother!

http://www.kltv.com/global/story.asp?s=5599487


--------------------

10/27/06-Albertville, Ala.

Teen Arrested For Raping His Mother
Story and Video Provided By: WAFF, Raycom Media

Police say a Marshall County Alabama teen raped his mother to get revenge on his brother. Police say 19-year-old Gary Helms, Jr., raped his 45-year-old mother this past weekend at Willow Terrace Trailer Park on Doyle Drive in Albertville. It's a twisted crime that police say Helms admits. "From what we understand the rape stemmed from an argument between him and his brother. And apparently they were arguing over a girlfriend. And the rape was some sort of retaliation towards his brother," said Sgt. Jamie Smith of the Albertville Police Department.

It was unusual retaliation on an unsuspecting victim.

Authorities say Helms' mother was apparently passed out drunk on the couch when the rape started. "During the attack she did come to and recognize her attacker. (Reporter: As her son?) As her son," said Smith. That's when, according to the police report, the mother "tried to get away, but he held her down until he was finished." "It's totally sick is what it is," said Smith. Helms was arrested and charged with the 1st degree rape of his own mother.
Smith says it's hard to wrap your mind around.

"Shocked, shocked would be more a better way to describe it. That somebody would dip to the lows to do something of this nature. It's just pretty much a shock to the conscience of the general public," said Smith. Helms is being held in the Marshall County Jail on $100,000 bond.

------------------------------

What a sick fuck!